Blog Post

April Fool's Day top ten pranks

  • By JOANNE DUCKWORTH
  • 30 Mar, 2017

If you want some ideas for mischief making this April Fool's Day, then read on.

10. In 1980 the BBC reported that Big Ben, in order to keep up with the times, was going to be given a digital readout. The announcement shocked listeners, who protested the change. The BBC Japanese service also announced the clock hands would be sold to the first four listeners to contact them. One Japanese seaman in the mid-Atlantic immediately radioed in a bid.

9. In 2007, images of an 8-inch mummified creature resembling a fairy were posted on the website of the Lebanon Circle Magik Co. The site explained how the creature had been found by a man walking his dog along an old Roman road in rural Derbyshire. By April 1 the Lebanon Circle website had received tens of thousands of visitors and hundreds of emails.
But, at the end of April 1, Dan Baines, the owner of the site, confessed the fairy was a hoax. He had used his skills as a magician's prop-maker to create the creature. Baines later reported that, even after his confession, he continued to receive numerous emails from people who refused to accept the fairy wasn't real.

8.
A barge towing a giant iceberg appeared in Sydney Harbor in April 1978. Dick Smith, a local adventurer and millionaire businessman, had been loudly promoting his scheme to tow an iceberg from Antarctica, saying he was going to carve the berg into small ice cubes, which he would sell to the public for ten cents each. These cubes, fresh from the pure waters of Antarctica, were promised to improve the flavour of any drink they cooled.
Local radio stations provided blow-by-blow coverage of the scene, but when it started to rain the firefighting foam and shaving cream the berg was really made of washed away, uncovering the white plastic sheets beneath.

7. In 1860 people throughout London received the following invitation: "Tower of London: Admit Bearer and Friend to view annual ceremony of Washing the White Lions on Sunday, April 1, 1860. Admittance only at White Gate." By noon a large crowd had gathered outside the tower. They were disappointed to find that lions hadn't been kept in the tower for centuries, let alone white lions.

6. Burger King published a full page advertisement in USA Today in 1998. The advert announced a new item on their menu: the Left-Handed Whopper. Especially designed for the 32 million left-handed Americans, the new burger included the same ingredients as the original Whopper, but all the condiments were rotated 180 degrees.Thousands of customers went into restaurants to request the new sandwich, while many others requested their own 'right handed' version.

5. On 1 April 1972, newspaper headlines around the world announced the dead body of the Loch Ness Monster had been found. A team of zoologists from Yorkshire's Flamingo Park Zoo, who were at Loch Ness searching for proof of Nessie's existence, had discovered the carcass floating in the water the day before. Initial reports claimed it weighed a ton and a half and was 15½ feet long. Upon inspection, Nessie turned out to be a bull elephant seal.
The zoo's education officer, John Shields, confessed he had been responsible for placing the body in the Loch. The seal had died the week before, and he had shaved off its whiskers, padded its cheeks with stones, and kept it frozen for a week, before dumping it in the Loch. The seal's body was displayed at the Flamingo Park Zoo for a few days before being properly disposed of.

4. In 1977 the Guardian published a seven-page "special report" about San Serriffe, a small country located in the Indian Ocean consisting of several islands that make the shape of a semi-colon. The two main islands were called Upper Caisse and Lower Caisse. They did an in-depth series of articles on the history, geography and daily life on these idyllic islands. The Guardian's phones rang all day as readers wanted more information about the perfect-sounding fictional holiday spot, and the hoax began a tradition in newspapers to try and fool their readers.

3. During an interview on BBC Radio 2, on the morning of 1 April 1976, the astronomer Patrick Moore announced that at 9:47 AM a once-in-a-lifetime astronomical event was going to take place. The planet Pluto would pass behind Jupiter, temporarily causing a gravitational alignment that would reduce the Earth's own gravity. Moore told his listeners that if they jumped in the air at the exact moment this planetary alignment occurred, they would experience a strange floating sensation.The BBC received hundreds of phone calls from listeners claiming to have felt the sensation. One woman even reported she and her 11 friends had risen from their chairs and floated around the room.

2. The best known public prank is the 1957 news show broadcast by Panorama. It was a three-minute segment about a bumper spaghetti harvest in southern Switzerland. This was apparently because of an unusually mild winter and the "virtual disappearance of the spaghetti weevil," with video footage of a Swiss family pulling pasta off spaghetti trees and placing it into baskets. The show said: "For those who love this dish, there's nothing like real, home-grown spaghetti."  Hundreds of people phoned the BBC wanting to know how they could grow their own spaghetti tree. To this query the BBC simply said: "Place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best."

1. In Sweden, in 1962, there was only one television channel, and it was shown in black and white. The station announced that their "technical expert," Kjell Stensson, was going to tell people how to view color images on their black-and-white sets. Researchers, he said, had recently discovered that covering your television screen with a pair of tights would cause the light to bend in such a way that it would appear as if the image was in color. All viewers had to do, Stensson said, was to cut open a pair of stockings and tape them over the screen of their television set. Thousands of viewers fell for the hoax. Many say today that they remember their parents (their fathers in particular) rushing through the house trying to find stockings to place over the TV set. Regular colour broadcasts began in Sweden on April 1, 1970.

GRD New perspective on Money Blog.

By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 02 Oct, 2017
It suggests firms should take older borrowers into account more with their policies and proposition.

It adds that mortgage companies should also plan for consumer needs at different point in their lives.

Finally, the FCA recommends firms should be “considering potential innovation in product features or terms and supporting services to accommodate specific life events.”

However, the FCA says these issues are hard for individual firms to tackle, and also praised the mortgage trade bodies’ own research and “significant
It suggests firms should take older borrowers into account more with their policies and proposition.

It adds that mortgage companies should also plan for consumer needs at different point in their lives.

Finally, the FCA recommends firms should be “considering potential innovation in product features or terms and supporting services to accommodate specific life events.”

However, the FCA says these issues are hard for individual firms to tackle, and also praised the mortgage trade bodies’ own research and “significant  efforts” towards helping older borrowers.

The FCA says older borrowers often do not have enough choice of mortgage products and that lenders have a “limited appetite” for the loans.
It says: “This could be due to fewer local branches, fewer products offered by high street brands that meet their needs, or restrictions in lending criteria to older consumers.”
Lenders may also fear regulatory punishment when lending to older consumers.
This leads to issues with accessing suitable mortgage products, the FCA says.
The regulator also says its own rules may not help older borrowers.
There are also some regulatory barriers to innovation, such as the withdrawal of retirement interest-only mortgages, but that it is looking to bring these back.
The FCA also says brokers have problems navigating products for older borrowers.

The regulator says “opaque or nuanced” criteria and complex affordability assessments make it hard for brokers to compare options.

This can lead to brokers only recommending a small number of products they are familiar with.

The regulator also says lenders may not be clearly publishing information about upper age limits or acceptable sources of retirement income on their websites or literature.
The FCA says it is neutral about upper age limits in mortgage lending, though notes many lenders have increased this or removed it.

But it adds: “Although we have noted some progress in this area, consumer groups, firms and trade bodies report that increases to upper age limits will not be sufficient to facilitate lending to older borrowers.

“Firms may be unnecessarily limiting themselves, and older borrowers, by having rigid policies or systems and controls that are unable to consider individual circumstances, potentially resulting in unintended exclusion of credit-worthy consumers in the target market.”

The regulator also reassured mortgage firms and trade bodies who feel that lending to older borrowers is a minefield and that the regulator may punish them for making mistakes.

The occasional paper says: “Our MCOB rules do not aim to discourage firms from lending to older borrowers, as long as they are credit-worthy. Decisions about lending strategy, identification of an appropriate target market, and application of any specific restrictions in lending policies are left to the discretion of individual firms.”

The regulator adds that it knows defining what ‘income’ is can be complicated for lenders catering to older borrowers.

It says lenders should take a common sense approach to this.

The FCA also says it will review its Handbook to make sure it is easy for firms to interpret, but that it needs to wait for Brexit first. Read More.
By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 17 Jul, 2017
Join in the 50 things Summer Fun with the National Trust this summer 2017
By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 03 Jul, 2017
GRD Financial Services Ltd are proud to sponsor Properties for Sale or Rent in Lancashire. As a Mortgage Broker it is vital to support the property community in the sale of their properties. Aiming to assist estate agents, clients and the general public of Lancashire. Make your posts on the site today, boost your property sales. If you require a #MortgageBroker then please contact GRD Financial Services Ltd , FREE initial consultation. Call 01704822108
By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 24 May, 2017
How one mans journey can change the way you think, feel and act. Putting life into perspective and realising how precious life and time is, and that we should stop thinking about the what iffs, and doubting our own abilities, and just do it, go for it and live your dreams.
By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 10 May, 2017
With a general slowdown in the property market, many buy-to-let landlords are looking instead to see how they can increase the profitability of their current property portfolios.
The key to maximising the rental value of properties is understanding how to attract tenants who will pay the most or finding a way to get more rent from property.
One of the first things landlords need to understand is the type of tenants who would be attracted to their type of property and location.
If it is in the vicinity of a college or university, properties may be suitable for students. There may already be plenty of properties for undergraduates, but overseas students – who are generally wealthier – post-graduates and even lecturers may be happy to pay more for a well-maintained home.
Whichever tenant type will maximise the rent for property in a given area, the likelihood is the most rent will be achieved by making sure it is in excellent condition. For example, the rent on a new-build will tend to be at least 10pc more than on an existing home.
Here are six ways of maximising rental income:
 1. A new paint job and clean-up
These days, tenants tend to stay in a property for around two years, so they are not looking for temporary accommodation as they may have been in the past, but for a home they can call their own.
According to the Government’s English Housing Survey 2014/5, 30pc of privately rented properties are not considered “decent”. As such, one of the cheapest ways to raise rental income is for landlords to make sure their properties are well maintained, easy to heat, have no damp or condensation issues, and are given a good clean and a lick of paint.
2. Upgrade kitchens and bathrooms
Replacing a tired and out-of-date kitchen and bathroom can not only have an impact on rents but can encourage the tenant to stay longer, reducing re-letting costs and potential void periods in between lets.
3. Add en-suites
Modern student halls often have en-suites, but not all rental properties do. So, if it is possible to add private facilities – especially for landlords who are renting rooms – it is worth doing so as this may attract wealthier tenants who are willing to pay extra for the facilities.  
 4. Can you extend?
If renting rooms is not an option, such as where the property is not large enough, it may be possible to add extra space to create more rooms to rent. Alternatively a landlord may have a two-bed property of a type that is oversupplied in an area where tenants are desperate for three-bed properties.
An easy-to-add single extension may not just boost rental income, but should also raise the overall property value, boosting overall returns. Any such changes will of course require that landlords secure any required planning permission and ensure it passes building control.
 5. Target specialised rental markets
Some properties may be suited to tenants who can pay more, such as a home that incorporates a 'granny annexe' for multi-generational living. However landlords look to improve their rental income, it is important that they talk to local property experts to check the implications of renting to different tenant types and the increased rental income will cover any rise in letting costs.
 6. Offer ‘added extras’
Many people consider that tenants are renting because they are on a budget, however, in some areas, renting can actually be cheaper than buying.
If as a landlord you have access to a premium tenant market, it may be possible to secure more rent by providing a higher than average spec property with state of the art appliances, décor and security systems. Do check this investment will deliver enough additional rent to cover the higher costs and that premium tenants will rent your property type in the area it’s located.
Safer buy-to-let investment
Whether you are thinking of investing or are already a landlord, the Telegraph , on behalf of Direct Line, has created useful information on the ever-changing buy-to-let market.

By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 05 Apr, 2017
  • Parents GRD would like to invite you to join in the colouring competition with your little ones, classifications include

    Age Categories  
    3yrs - 8yrs
    9yrs - 14yrs
    Just print off the picture and colour with pens, pencils or paint (computerised colours will not be allowed) you can return it to us in the following ways, take a picture of the picture and email it to info@grdfinancialservices.com or send it to
    Office A07
    Towngate Works
    Dark Lane
    Mawdesley
    L402QU
    All entries need to be returned by the 14th April 2017 , judged on the 15th April and the winner notified on this day, the Winner will then receive a fantastic Cadburys Chocolate Easter Egg .
    Enjoy the challenge and we look forward to hearing from you, please join us via the following social media sites.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 30 Mar, 2017
Soon April Fool's Day will be upon us, which means being on your guard to avoid those practical jokes.

It's a tradition that goes back hundreds of years, but where did it all start?


There are many theories but the one that most hold to links back to a pope - though it isn't a religious holiday.

Where did it all start then? Why do we celebrate it?...and what can we do to be crowned best prankster (you know you want to know)?

How did April Fool's Day begin?

The change to the calendar was too much.
While no one really agrees on what happened, there is strong evidence that it is all down to Pope Gregory XIII, who adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1582 - this moved our year from March to Jan 1.

The change was published far and wide, but some didn't get the memo. These people celebrated the New Year on April 1 and were ridiculed and seen as foolish - hence Fool's Day.

The French would put paper fish on the 'fool's' backs and were called Poisson d'Avril, or April Fish - it's still the term used in France for April Fool's.
This doesn't quite work out though as the Julian Calendar, established in 46BC, made January the first month of the year. Countries began to switch calendars, and it all ended up being a mess by the 1500s. Some countries started the year on different days.

While it's not clear what calendar had what impact a lot of the theories stem from the idea of the date moving to January.
Renewal festivals where everyone was a fool

Others say the April Fool's Day is left over from the idea of "renewal festivals" marking the end of winter and the beginning of spring.

The festivals apparently involved those taking part donning disguises, playing tricks on friends and strangers, and causing chaos.

Others mistake the celebrations for medieval Christianity's Feast of Fools, which took place each January.

Christians elected a Lord of Misrule who wore masks, dressed up and sung obscene songs. They generally behaved badly. While this all sounds great, it wasn't actually what happened. I know, Disney lied to us, or rather Victor Hugo the author did. The festival which was portrayed in the Hunchback of Notre-Dame didn't happen like this. Hugo - and then Disney - made it all up, so they have nothing to do with April Fool's.

The actual Feast of Fools was held in the 12th and 13th century and was seen as an alternative to the rowdy festivals. There were role reversals, and the fools represented those chosen by God because of their lowly status. Later clergy stopped the feast, and was finally forbidden by the Council of Basle in 1435. Another theory is the French Revolution played a part. April 1 is the anniversary of the event...you may ask why is this linked to comedy?

Historians say back on April 1, 1789, after the French people deposed King Louis XVI, King George III of England made a joke which has continued the tradition until today. He pretended to step down.

The peasants took to the streets to celebrate their new freedom.. and then were arrested and imprisoned. In Roman mythology Pluto, the God of the Dead, abducted Proserpina and brought her to live with him in the underworld.

Proserpina called to her mother Ceres for help, but she could only hear the echo of her daughter's voice. She searched in vain.

Some say the fruitless search was the basis for the 'fool's errands'.

The town of Gotham's trick .
There's a folk tale which links the Fool's Day to a town called Gotham, Nottinghamshire.

It traditional in the 13th century for any road that the King placed his foot upon to become public property. When the people of Gotham heard that King John planned to travel through their town, they refused to let him in as they didn't want to lose their main road.

The King upon hearing this sent his soldiers, but when they arrived they just found a town full of lunatics. The people were acting out foolish activities like drowning fish or attempting to cage birds in roofless cages.

It was all an act, but the King fell for it. The town was seen as too foolish. April Fool's Day was supposed to mark their victory.

Chaucer's riddle of a date In Chaucer's The Nun's Priest's Tale a fox tricks a rooster on ”syn March bigan thritty dayes and two.”

Chaucer probably meant 32 days after March - May 2, but may took it to mean March 32 or April 1.

It was seen as a reference to April Fool's.

The best pranks ever Click here for more info

1. Spaghetti harvest



By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 23 Mar, 2017
A massive police operation is under way after a terror attack in Westminster, in the heart of London, yesterday in which four people died.
Here's what happened, and everything we know so far, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/22/westminster-terror-attack-everything-know-far/
What happened in Westminster?
An attacker, who was armed with two knives, killed two pedestrians and injured around 40 other people as he mowed down members of the public with a car on Westminster Bridge before crashing into the railings in front of Parliament.
Then, bursting through the gate to the Palace of Westminster, he stabbed unarmed Pc Keith Palmer, 48, before being shot dead by armed officers.
Paramedics fought to save his life and that of Pc Palmer on the floor of the cobbled courtyard just yards from the House of Commons. Both Pc Palmer and the attacker were later confirmed dead. Two large knives could be seen at the scene.
Foreign Office minister Tobias Ellwood was among those who rushed to help. Mr Ellwood, who lost his brother in the Bali bombing, was seen pumping the officer's chest then standing above him, his hands and face smeared with blood.

Who was the attacker?
Mrs May has told the House of Commons that the British-born attacker had been identified as someone known by police and MI5, and the working assumption was that he was inspired by Islamist terrorism.
He has not been publicly identified yet and police believe he was acting alone, although they are investigating possible associates.
Mrs May said: "What I can confirm is that the man was British-born and that some years ago he was once investigated by MI5 in relation to concerns about violent extremism. He was a peripheral figure. The case is historic. He was not part of the current intelligence picture. There was no prior intelligence of his intent or of the plot."

Eyewitnesses reported seeing an Asian man in his 40s carrying two large knives. The suspected attacker is pictured on a stretcher below.

How many arrests has there been?
Eight people have been arrested so far, and six addresses raided across London, Birmingham and elsewhere.
The Birmingham raid took place on the Hagley Road, a mile or so southwest of Birmingham city centre.

Pc Keith Palmer
Pc Palmer, 48, was a husband and father, and had worked for the Metropolitan Police for 15 years, having previously served in the armed forces.
Conservative MP James Cleverly paid tribute to the “lovely man” he had known for a quarter of a century.  “I’ve known Keith for 25 years. We served together in the Royal Artillery before he became a copper,” he wrote.
“A lovely man, a friend. I’m heartbroken. My thoughts are with the family, friends and colleagues of PC Keith Palmer. A brave man.”

Aysha Frade
Spanish teacher and department head Aysha Frade, 43, worked at DLD College, London and was married with two daughters.
She was believed to have been crossing Westminster Bridge to pick up her children aged eight and 11 from school when she lost her life in the attack.
According to Spanish newspaper La Voz de Galicia, the woman had always lived in London, where her parents met. Her father was of Cypriot origin while her mother was born in Betanzos in northwestern Spain.
According to La Voz, the woman often spent her holidays with her family back in the town.

A man in his mid-50s was also killed in the incident on the bridge. His identity is not yet known.

What about those injured?
Those injured included 12 Britons, three French children, two Romanians, four South Koreans, two Greeks, and one each from Germany, Poland, Ireland, China, Italy and the United States.
Three police officers were also hurt, two of them seriously. Two of three French teenagers caught up in the carnage are believed to have been seriously injured.

Read the full story here


By JOANNE DUCKWORTH 21 Dec, 2016

GRD have recently read a paper regarding buy to let investment. Those of you who may know GRD Financial Services, will know our dedication to delivering great products in the Buy to Let Market, having many clients with property portfolios and clients who are accidental landlords. No matter who the client is, GRD will always go that extra mile to source the best product which meets the needs of the clients.

2016 has seen a decline in the Buy to Let property purchases, however what we are about to share with you, will demonstrate why the savvy investors will see 2017 as a great opportunity. A well known entrepreneur once told me that one persons recession is another persons opportunity. We hope that your fears and apprehensions about the property market will be laid to rest after we have shared this information with you, and look forward to working with you in 2017, building your portfolio and obtaining the best Buy to Let Mortgage for you and your company. Please enjoy, the article is published by Progressive Property.

“Why the media is wrong, what the property elite don’t want you to know and why now is the best time to get into buy to let”

HOW YOU CAN MAKE A FORTUNE FROM PROPERTY IN 2017

“Death of buy-to-let: landlords wake up to Osborne’s 150% tax Buy-to-let investors paying more than 100% of their profits in tax are already sell up!”

Headlines like this (that the Telegraph ran on the 22 August 2015) certainly scare off the uninformed and those people that we all know that will never get into property because the timing is not quite right. By getting your hands on this report you’ve proven that you are determined to be one of the select few that are able to profit in this market uncertainty.

So why is 2016 the best time to get into buy to let? To answer this most succinctly I’d like to quote the most successful investor of all time, Warren Buffet:

“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful”

As you know there is a huge amount of fear about property investment right now because of headlines like the one above. So what is the truth that savvy and successful property investors are using right now to make fortunes?

The short answer is that they are doing the opposite to the masses and doubling their efforts to buy as much property now while they can get it cheap. Here’s the detailed reasoning behind that flippant statement:

I have been doing this over 10 years and have noticed that every few years something significant happens to change the landscape. The changes I have witnessed have never been a reason to sell (although I use them as a reason to buy cheap properties from people who think they are).

We know property investment has worked in the UK for the last 1000 years (we have rough data from the days of William the Conqueror). We’ve seen property price changes since 1066 and now the introduction of a tax (albeit not properly thought through) which will be introduced slowly (next 5 years) and which can be avoided by using a ltd company. This tax change is highly unlikely to alter things significantly in the long term.

Much bigger events in recent times were:

The credit crunch/recession of 2008: The amount of doom and gloom; people saying it was the end of property investment (even experienced people). Properties dropped 20-30% for 3-5 years (some places more) depending where you are located. In the vast majority of areas prices have recovered and are now higher than just before the crunch started. Tenant demand increased and rents rose through this time.

Actual RESULT: Landlords who held on and ignored the noise did best. Landlords who used it as a buying opportunity did amazingly well. Much of the stock we bought in this period is now worth (conservatively) 30% more.

Housing benefit was/is being reduced by the conservative government: This means that LHA tenants get less rent and Universal Credit gets introduced. Those landlords who adapted to take more private tenants and stop LHA have found that private rents have since increased anyway.

Actual RESULT: Landlords who adapted to take private tenants and ignored the noise did best.

HOW YOU CAN MAKE A FORTUNE FROM PROPERTY IN 2017

Mortgage Express/other lenders removed the daylight bridge in 2008: Doomsters thought it was the end of being able to buy/control property with reduced funds/deposits. Those investors who adapted and learned new strategies and continued to buy using JVs, lease options and buy-refurbremortgage did best.

Actual RESULT: Landlords who kept on going and ignored the noise did best. Landlords who used it as a buying opportunity did amazingly well, much of the stock we bought in this period is now worth (conservatively) 30% more.

Sale and rent back deals (where a property was purchased and rented back to a homeowner who wanted to release cash/clear their mortgage) were effectively banned (regulated): Many thought it was the end. Those who evolved just changed their strategies to move people out of their homes and into another similar rental property or targeted people who didn’t want to rent back.

Actual RESULT: Landlords who adapted to move these people into other properties in their portfolio and therefore were able to continue to buy their properties cheap, did best.

The last Labour government introduced rules which said that planning permission would be required for all new HMOs (even below 6 tenants): People shouted, moaned and many said it was the end. The new government realised how crazy this was and in 2010 this rule was reversed and planning was no longer required.

Actual RESULT: Landlords who adapted their strategy and ignored the noise did best. Many learned what properties planning could be acquired on and bought HMOs in these areas. In 2010, they reverted to their old strategy as the authorities came to their senses.

Another thing to remember is that the things I have mentioned above ACTUALLY happened.

90% (no exaggeration) of things that people worry about won’t and have not actually happened, some of which are below:

“The EU will force the banning/regulation of buy to let mortgages” the UK treasury got rid of this with an amendment to the interpretation of a professional investor.

“Buy to let mortgages will all but be removed from the market” The Times ran an article with a similar headline to this in 2008. The reality at the time was that buy to let mortgages on offer had reduced but it was clear that there were still many options, those who persevered got borrowing and the market has grown significantly since the recession.

“Properties will drop 50% to 70% during the credit crunch” yes they dropped but not by this margin and this didn’t affect those who held.

“Interest only mortgages are finished, capital repayment will be the only option following the credit crunch” Whilst Owner Occupier mortgages in the main became capital repayment, the buy to let mortgage market remained almost exclusively interest only.

This is just a snap shot of the article, if you would like to read more please click here .

More Posts
Share by: